![]() Fig. 1. Number of
soldiers (as of April, 2007) wounded in the course of Iraq War |
| Chapter I | Tragedy at Mayerling | |
| Chapter II | Death of a Princess | |
| Chapter III | Malediction | |
|
|
Chapter IV | The First Casualty of War |
| Chapter V | Credibility of Foreign Informants | |
| Chapter VI | Confabulations of Nurse Nayirah | |
| Chapter VII | Jumana Hanna and Sara Solovitch | |
| Chapter VIII | Origins of the First World War | |
| Chapter IX | Ritual Slaughter | |
| Chapter X | Search for Implausible Narratives |
![]() |
The first casualty of war Official government statistics are often unreliable, biased, or outright fraudulent. However, sometimes it is possible to uncover the degree to which they are falsified. Consider the following facts. As of April 10, 2007, the official number of reported casualties in the Iraq war was 3,288 and the reported number of the American wounded soldiers was 24,476. About the same time, Ronald Glaser, M.D., in a signed article in the Washington Post (Glaser, 2007) reported that the ratio of wounded to killed soldiers in the Iraq is 16 to 1. Glaser's article is an objective report on medical matters, unlikely to be biased. According to this ratio, the number of wounded soldiers in the course of the Iraq war would be about 52,600 and not 24,467, as reported by the U.S. Department of Defense. The magnitude of this discrepancy is visualized in Figure 1.
In 1917, Senator Hiram Johnson observed (Knightley, 1975) that
The first casualty when war comes is truth
this statement being true today as ever.
References
Glaser, R. (2007) A shock wave of brain injuries. Washington Post, April 8.
Knightley, P. (1975) The first casualty. New York: Harcourt Brace.