| PART I | ETHICAL CANONS CONCERNING WAR | |
| Chapter 1 | About Ethical Canons and War | |
| Chapter 2 | Decisions Precipitating War | |
| Chapter 3 | Human Sacrifice | |
| Chapter 4 | Amiriyah Shelter | |
| PART II | ETHICAL CANONS CONCERNING EQUALITY | |
| Chapter 5 | Slavery | |
| Chapter 6 | Arens' Atrocity Attribution Theory | |
| Chapter 7 | Genocide of Native Americans | |
| Chapter 8 | Intermarriage | |
| PART III | ETHICAL CANONS CONCERNING JUSTICE | |
| Chapter 9 | Incarceration | |
| Chapter 10 | Reemergence of Torture | |
| Chapter 11 | Witchcraft Trials | |
| Chapter 12 | Trials of Heretics | |
| PART IV | ETHICAL CANONS CONCERNING RELIGION | |
| Chapter 13 | The New and Old Testaments | |
| Chapter 14 | Transplanted Mentality | |
| Chapter 15 | God and His Messengers | |
| PART V | ETHICAL CANONS CONCERNING EMPATHY | |
| Chapter 16 | Karla Tucker and George W. Bush | |
| Chapter 17 | A Girl with the Almond Eyes | |
| Chapter 18 | Beyond Partiality: Building a World of Laughter and Love |
The New and Old Testaments
In the first century, a group of intellectuals (according to unattested sources centered around the Rome's Pisa family) admired the success of the Jewish religion and patterned after it its Christian version. This version of Torah, abbreviated, updated, revised and mythologized, was recorded in the New Testament. In the seventh century, the Muhammad followed their example and elaborated another version of Torah, recorded in the Qur'an.
|
|
During the Dark and Middle Ages the books were few and expensive and most
converts to Christianity did not read the Bible. Biblical stories and precepts
were communicated by oral narratives, mostly by priests who told the codified
interpretation of Bible to their parishioners. With the invention of printing
and translation of Bible into local languages, people started to read Bible for
themselves and, as the Bible is open to many interpretations, new variations of
Judaism started to emerge.
Bible is a thick book with the written Torah (Old Testament) taking most of its
bulk. According to Anderson's (1974) model of opinion change, opinions and
beliefs have aside of a superficial component also a basal component, which is
effected by the law of primacy and is largely resistant to change once it had
come into being. Thus, predictably, the 'people of the book' remembered better
the opening chapters of the Bible than the chapters that follow and started to
stress the lore of the Old Testament. Thus, gradually, the Christianity
bifurcated into Catholicism with a single, codified interpretation of the Bible
stressing the New Testament and Protestantism with multiple codified
interpretations of the Bible with the stress on the Old Testament. At that time
the phenomenon, latent since the inception of Christianity and called the
'transplanted mentality,' started to gain sharp contours.