Ethical Canons and Scientific Inquiry


 

  PART I ETHICAL CANONS CONCERNING WAR
  Chapter  1 About Ethical Canons and War
  Chapter  2 Decisions Precipitating War
  Chapter  3 Human Sacrifice
  Chapter  4 Amiriyah Shelter
  PART II ETHICAL CANONS CONCERNING EQUALITY
  Chapter  5 Slavery
  Chapter  6 Arens' Atrocity Attribution Theory
  Chapter  7 Genocide of Native Americans
  Chapter  8 Intermarriage
  PART III ETHICAL CANONS CONCERNING JUSTICE
  Chapter  9 Incarceration
  Chapter 10 Reemergence of Torture
  Chapter 11 Witchcraft Trials
  Chapter 12 Trials of Heretics
  PART IV ETHICAL CANONS CONCERNING RELIGION
Chapter 13 The New and Old Testaments
  Chapter 14 Transplanted Mentality
  Chapter 15 God and His Messengers
  PART V ETHICAL CANONS CONCERNING EMPATHY
  Chapter 16 Karla Tucker and George W. Bush
  Chapter 17 A Girl with the Almond Eyes
  Chapter 18 Beyond Partiality: Building a World of Laughter and Love

The New and Old Testaments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

In the first century, a group of intellectuals (according to unattested sources centered around the Rome's Pisa family) admired the success of the Jewish religion and patterned after it its Christian version. This version of Torah, abbreviated, updated, revised and mythologized, was recorded in the New Testament. In the seventh century, the Muhammad followed their example and elaborated another version of Torah, recorded in the Qur'an. 

 

 


     Number of pages in the Old and New Testament

During the Dark and Middle Ages the books were few and expensive and most converts to Christianity did not read the Bible. Biblical stories and precepts were communicated by oral narratives, mostly by priests who told the codified interpretation of Bible to their parishioners. With the invention of printing and translation of Bible into local languages, people started to read Bible for themselves and, as the Bible is open to many interpretations, new variations of Judaism started to emerge.
 
Bible is a thick book with the written Torah (Old Testament) taking most of its bulk. According to Anderson's (1974) model of opinion change, opinions and beliefs have aside of a superficial component also a basal component, which is effected by the law of primacy and is largely resistant to change once it had come into being. Thus, predictably, the 'people of the book' remembered better the opening chapters of the Bible than the chapters that follow and started to stress the lore of the Old Testament. Thus, gradually, the Christianity bifurcated into Catholicism with a single, codified interpretation of the Bible stressing the New Testament and Protestantism with multiple codified interpretations of the Bible with the stress on the Old Testament. At that time the phenomenon, latent since the inception of Christianity and called the 'transplanted mentality,' started to gain sharp contours.