Visual Statistics Studio
Visual Statistics Studio     Outline of Visual Statistics     Library

Krus, D. J. & Tellegen, A.(1975). Consciousness III: fact or fiction? Psychological Reports, 36, 23-30.

 

  CONSCIOUSNESS III:  FACT OR FICTION?

David J. Krus and Auke Tellegen
University of Minnesota

Summary.-Reich's tripartite theory of social consciousness, as formulated in his book, The Greening of America, was translated into Consciousness I, II, and III Scales, based on content analysis of pertinent chapters in the book, and quantified. The factor analysis of these scales showed that Consciousness Scales load on two dimensions. Subsequent canonical analysis of these scales, followed by rotation of canonical weights into the simple structure, indicated that substantial amount of variance in the Consciousness Scales can be accounted for by the normative-humanistic constructs.

In the early seventies the bestseller list was topped by The Greening of America (Reich, 1971), a book eliciting a gamut of opinions. To Senator George McGovern, the book was 'one of the most gripping, penetrating and revealing analyses of American society I have yet seen,' whereas to Peter Marin of the New York Times Book Review, it was 'simplistic, misleading, presumptuous.' Reich's book attempted a description of the ideological niveau of the last three generations. The self-interest, aggressiveness, and prejudice of the two older generations (Consciousness I and II) were seen to be in the sharp contrast with the Consciousness III of the new generation.

The present study is an attempt to ascertain the degree of plausibility of Reich's typology and its place within the family of other personality constructs. This involved a translation of Reich's original qualitative and intuitively derived observations into quantitative scales and an empirical exploration of the relationship of these scales to Tomkins' (1964) Polarity Scale, Tellegen's (1972) scales of Authoritarianism and Absorption and subjects’ chronological age. Tomkins' Polarity Scale was designed to indicatehow humanistic and how normative in orientation the individual is' (Tomkins, 1964, p. 3). Tellegen's (1972) third generation Authoritarian Scale was designed to relate this construct to the emerging 'big two' personality dimensions of introversion-extraversion and dominance-submission. Tellegen & Atkinson’s (1974) Absorption Scale is characterized by items such as 'textures--such as wool, sand, wood--sometimes remind me of colors or music,' and 'I like to watch cloud shapes change in the sky,' and is moderately related to hypnotic susceptibility.

METHOD

The descriptions of Consciousness I, II, and III in The Greening of America (Reich, 1971, pp. 20-41, 62-90, 233-285) were converted into the form typical of standard agree-disagree opinion inventories. Items on the Consciousness I, II, and III Scales were combined with items comprising the other scales included in the analysis. Instructions printed on the test booklet were: 'In this booklet you will find a series of statements a person might use to describe his attitudes, opinions, interests, and other characteristics. Please read each question carefully but do not spend too much time choosing the best answer out of the two available.'

The questionnaire was administered by students enrolled in an evening statistics' class at the University of Minnesota. Subjects were their friends or relatives (N = 58). Evening class students generally have more varied backgrounds than full- time day class students, assuring better sampling than the traditional student pools, particularly with respect to the age of the subjects (13 to 57 yr., M =  29 yr., SD = 123).  The obtained responses were analyzed by the factor analysis and by the canonical analysis.

Factor Analysis

Scales included in the analysis were intercorrelated as shown in Table 1.

Table 1.  Intercorrelations between scales Included in the
analysis and the age of the subjects
.

 

2

3

4

5

6

7

1. Consciousness I+II

.61

.59

-.15

-.21

-.43

-.02

2. Normative

 

.32

-.09

.04

-.47

.08

3. Authoritarian

 

 

-.01

.00

-.16

-.00

4. Consciousness  III

 

 

 

.41

.56

-.40

5. Humanistic

 

 

 

 

.37

-.08

6. Absorption

 

 

 

 

 

-.31

7. Age

 

 

 

 

 

 

This correlation matrix was factor analyzed by the principal factors method with squared multiple correlations used as the communality estimates. The first two factors with eigenvalues equal to 2.19 and 1.80 accounted for 66.6% of the total variance. The third factor with eigenvalue equal to .75 did not meet the Kaiser's retention criterion and was deleted. Figure 1 shows the resulting factorial structure plotted from the Varimax rotated matrix of factor loadings.

Figure 1.  Factorial structure of the Consciousness Scales.

The Consciousness I and II Scales together with the Normative and Authoritarian Scales define the first factor while the Consciousness III Scale together with the Humanistic and Absorption Scales define the second factor.

Canonical Analysis

The scales were also analyzed by the canonical analysis. As the Consciousness I and II Scales reflect a similar construct, they were combined into a single scale and, together with the Consciousness III Scale, defined the criterion set of variables. The other scales involved in the analysis comprised the predictor set of variables. The extracted eigenvalues and their corresponding canonical correlations are shown in the Table 2.

Table 2. Eigenvalues and Canonical Correlations for the
 Canonical Analysis of the Consciousness Scales.

 

Eigenvalues

Canonical Correlations

Canonical Components

1

2

1

2

1

.626

.000

.791

.000

2

.000

.399

.000

.632

The results of the unrotated canonical analysis indicated that within the first canonical component, the predictor set of variables accounted for 63% of variance of the first component of the Consciousness Scales. Within the second canonical component, the predictor set of variables accounted for 40% of variance of the second component of the Consciousness Scales. As these components are orthogonal, the explained variances are not additive and to speak of the total amount of variance explained by the predictor set of variables is nonsensical. Next, the canonical weights were graphically rotated, as shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2. Graphical Rotation of Canonical Weights.

The extracted eigenvalues and their corresponding canonical correlations for the rotated solution are shown in the Table 3.

Table 3. Eigenvalues and Canonical Correlations for the
 Rotated Canonical Analysis of the Consciousness Scales.

 

Eigenvalues

Canonical Correlations

Canonical Components

1

2

1

2

1

.576

.004

.759

-.064

2

.004

.442

-.064

.665

The results of the rotated canonical analysis indicated that within the first canonical component, the predictor set of variables accounted for 58% of variance of the first component of the Consciousness Scales. Within the second canonical component, the predictor set of variables accounted for 44% of variance of the second component of the Consciousness Scales. The obtained and the rotated canonical weights are reported in Table 4.

Table 4. The Obtained and the Rotated Canonical Weights.

 

Consciousness I+II

Consciousness III

Canonical Weights

Obtained

Rotated

Obtained

Rotated

Consciousness III -.276 .193 .973 .993
Consciousness I + II .921 .999 .418 -.043

Normative

.499

.625

.497

.241

Authoritarian

.500

.588

.314

.054

Absorption

-.304

-.024

.654

.721

Humanistic

-.304

-.183

.196

.312

Age

-.036

-.231

-.442

-.378

Canonical weights were graphically rotated about 260 in the counterclockwise direction.
 The rotation of canonical weights suggested that, as in factor analysis, rotation is a         
 conditio sine qua non for meaningful interpretation of results of the canonical analysis.

The structure of the rotated canonical weights, isomorphic with the obtained factor analytic structure, are in congruence with intuitive understanding of these constructs.

The Reich's book is an incisive analysis of the social niveau of the sixties and the early seventies, as reflected by the Consciousness Scales. Results of the factor analysis and results of the canonical analysis suggest that even though the dominant issues of the post-war generation appeared unique, they reflected the enduring humanistic-normative facets of human affairs.

REFERENCES

Abrams, M. H. (1958) The mirror and the lamp. New York:  Norton.

Reich, C. A. (1971) The greening of America. New York: Bantam.

Tellegen, A., & Atkinson, G. (1973) Openness to absorbing and self-altering experiences (‘absorption’), a trait related to hypnotic susceptibility. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 33, 268-277.

Tomkins, S. S. (1964) Polarity scale. New York: Springer.

Accepted October 30, 1974
  Visual Statistics Studio

Visual Statistics Studio     Outline of Visual Statistics     Library